{"id":225,"date":"1975-11-02T18:07:55","date_gmt":"1975-11-03T01:07:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/?p=225"},"modified":"2015-01-17T19:32:11","modified_gmt":"2015-01-18T02:32:11","slug":"sewage-plcmf-expcansion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/?p=225","title":{"rendered":"Sewage Plant Expansion &#8211; Bond Issue Needed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/scans\/Herald_-_Xeroxes\/Xerox_PartX_035.jpg\"><img style=\"margin: 12px;\" src=\"http:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/default_thm.jpg\" alt=\"Click to see original image\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a>Provoans will vote on a bond proposition, in addition to choosing a city commissioner and a city auditor, when they go to the polls Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>They will be asked to approve or reject a $5,000,000 bond issue to defray one-fourth the cost of expanding the city sewage treatment plant and adding appurtenant facilities.<\/p>\n<p>The expansion is necessary because (1) the city&#8217;s growth demands a larger plant; and (2) under state and federal regulations cities are required to upgrade treatment plant effectiveness.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the project is a must and it&#8217;s our job to accomplish it. The timing is opportune because city officials have been able to get a $16.5 million federal grant &#8211; most of which will be used on this project to provide three-fourths federal financing. That&#8217;s a favorable ratio. It&#8217;s anticipated the matching percentage may be more like 50-50 in future years.<\/p>\n<p>Provo&#8217;s sewage treatment plant was built in 1956 and has had two small additions. Population has increased from 28,000 to about 60,000 since.<\/p>\n<p>Cities in Utah County led the state in building treatment facilities then. Now they&#8217;re preparing modernizing and expansion and Provo will lead off if the bond is approved Tuesday. The planned facility is intended to accommodate a population\u00a0of 100,000.<\/p>\n<p>The North Utah County cities of Lehi, American Fork, Pleasant Grove and Alpine are organized and engineering studies for a joint plant are proceeding. Orem and Lindon are\u00a0planning to go together. Payson, Spanish Fork, Springville, Salem, and Mapleton organized a\u00a0planning district Thursday night, with Provo also represented but not as a voting member.<\/p>\n<p>New standards provide that effluent quality for Class C &#8211; which means water will be of sufficient quality that it can be processed by treatment for culinary use, if necessary. Presently Prov0&#8217;s effluent is short of meeting Class D specifications.<\/p>\n<p>When cities of the valley get their disposal facilities updated, it is expected Utah Lake pollution will have been reduced to allow swimming and other recreational uses.<\/p>\n<p>Provo&#8217;s bond proposition specifies interest not to exceed 9 per cent. With a Double-A bond rating, the city is hoping to qualify for a 6 to 6.5 per cent rate. Bonds would be issued as needed; construction will be over a three-year period.<\/p>\n<p>We emphasize that the bonds will be repaid by increases in the city&#8217;s sewerage charge. Projections indicate the average residential bill will go from $2.72 to $3.71 per month. A residential bill of $8 would cost $10.73. An $8 commercial rate would go to $27.50; and a commercial bill of $50 to $219.<\/p>\n<p>A public hearing on the! new rates will be held if the bond passes. Provo currently ranks seventh among cities in county sewage rates; the proposed increases would place the city third.<\/p>\n<p>The Herald\u00a0traditionally advocates economy and keeping the tax burden down. In the proposed sewage plant expansion, we have a responsibility in which we ourselves are the main beneficiary &#8211; and it would be poor economy to shirk the task:\u00a0We suggest an affirmative vote Tuesday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Provoans will vote on a bond proposition, in addition to choosing a city commissioner and a city auditor, when they go to the polls Tuesday. They will be asked to approve or reject a $5,000,000 bond issue to defray one-fourth the cost of expanding the city sewage treatment plant and adding appurtenant facilities. The expansion&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/?p=225\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Sewage Plant Expansion &#8211; Bond Issue Needed<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[24,54],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=225"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1880,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225\/revisions\/1880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}