{"id":846,"date":"1978-10-06T18:08:26","date_gmt":"1978-10-07T01:08:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/?p=846"},"modified":"2014-12-06T06:29:51","modified_gmt":"2014-12-06T13:29:51","slug":"getting-c-u-project-buckon-truck-after-carter-veto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/?p=846","title":{"rendered":"Getting C-U Project Back On Track After Carter Veto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/scans\/Editorials_1978\/Editorial_PartX_006.jpg\"><img style=\"margin: 12px;\" src=\"http:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/default_thm.jpg\" alt=\"Click to see original image\" align=\"right\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>We cannot quarrel with President Carter&#8217;s resolve to do something about unnecessary spending and inflation &#8211; he deserves support in this.<\/p>\n<p>But we think he erred badly in his choice of\u00a0a place to make a stand &#8211; veto of the $10.2 billion public works bill, which the House sustained, lacking 53 votes for the two-thirds majority needed for an override.<\/p>\n<p>The bill &#8211; of special interest to Herald readers &#8211; contained $52.5 million for the Central Utah Project for fiscal 1979.<\/p>\n<p>In the words of Rep. Gunn McKay, D-Utah: &#8220;Of all the spending bills only one pays back anything to the federal treasury and this is public works.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the Central Utah Project &#8211; which doesn&#8217;t deserve the &#8220;pork barrel&#8221; label President Carter attached to the bill &#8211; is paid for mostly by the CUP water and power users on a voter-approved contract. Only about 10 to 15 percent of the cost will be paid by the government, this for certain recreational and other federal considerations.<\/p>\n<p>In other words. the money the government allocates is largely in the nature of a loan &#8211; a far cry from a federal handout.<\/p>\n<p>The CUP, this state&#8217;s No. 1 water development program, was approved in the 1950s under the Eisenhower\u00a0administration\u00a0and has had the support of five administrations until President Carter took office.<\/p>\n<p>Early in his term it became obvious he doesn&#8217;t understand western water problems when he sought to slash the CUP and many other water developments. His veto indicates he still isn&#8217;t convinced.<\/p>\n<p>House Speaker Thomas O&#8217;Neill seemed to put the picture in perspective with this comment: &#8221;I think the President isn&#8217;t thinking about the future of America,&#8221; and adding that the water problem some day will be just as serious as the energy problem today.<\/p>\n<p>Spending and inflation-wise, Carter&#8217;s veto of the fiscal 1979 appropriation will work in reverse insofar as local aspects of the CUP are concerned. Here is a project\u00a0well-advanced, with nearly $200 million spent to date. Delaying\u00a0completion will only send costs higher.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s an old story to Utahns already. The originally-projected costs have multiplied because of the smallness of appropriations and costly delays occasioned in part by environmentalist opposition.<\/p>\n<p>How do things stand in the face of the Carter veto? Clarification still was needed as this was written. However, a spokesman at the office of Sen. Jake Garn (R-Utah) told The Herald that a continuing resolution passed by Congress enables the various agencies to spend in the interim, at last year&#8217;s level, beyond Sept. 30 when fiscal 1978 ended.<\/p>\n<p>Last year&#8217;s Bonneville unit level was about $32 million. Money for the Uintah and Upalco units would be eliminated. The Jensen unit spent about $8 million last year and possibly could proceed since another $7 million was expected to finish the job.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. McKay has said President Carter agreed on completion of the CUP and likely wouldn&#8217;t veto a rewritten bill so long as projects he wants killed are eliminated. We hope another try will be successful &#8211; and trust also that funds for other truly meritorious projects, vetoed by\u00a0the President, will be restored.<\/p>\n<p>Undoubtedly new legislation will be forthcoming, but it would seem problematical whether it could clear Congress before adjournment. Action might be delayed well into next year.<\/p>\n<p>While the CUP generally has had good congressional support, it&#8217;s obvious that our Utah delegation has its work cut out in renewing that support and countering\u00a0the Presidents effective lobbying which even persuaded six western governors to support his veto.<\/p>\n<p>The urgent nature of the CUP needs to be &#8220;re-sold.&#8221; Certainly it is necessary to get the project back on the track after Wednesday&#8217;s setback.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Blowing Whistle Can Be Hazardous\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Whistleblowers who work for the government aren&#8217;t the only members of this all-too-fare species who get shot down.<\/p>\n<p>The Wall Street securities analyst who uncovered the Equity Funding Corp. scandal five years ago has been ordered punished by the Securities and Exchange Commission.<\/p>\n<p>An SEC administrative law judge suspended Raymond Dirks from the brokerage\u00a0business for 60 days for &#8220;selectively disseminated&#8221; information about Equity Funding. Apparently some investment companies managed\u00a0to sell their shares before the fraud scandal broke.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The\u00a0government is attempting to punish the bearer of bad tidings,&#8221; Dirks claimed, noting the companies involved got off with light censures.<\/p>\n<p>He vowed to &#8220;fight it all the way to the Supreme Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We cannot quarrel with President Carter&#8217;s resolve to do something about unnecessary spending and inflation &#8211; he deserves support in this. But we think he erred badly in his choice of\u00a0a place to make a stand &#8211; veto of the $10.2 billion public works bill, which the House sustained, lacking 53 votes for the two-thirds&hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/?p=846\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Getting C-U Project Back On Track After Carter Veto<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[57,9,52],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/846"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gashler.com\/nlc\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}