Would proposed development of the nearby Island Park Geothermal area endanger the geyser activity in Yellowstone National Park’? Montana Democratic Sen. John Melcher doesn’t think it’s worth the risk for the “relatively small amount of energy” the development would yield, especially with other energy sources available. “Yellowstone truly is the last great geyser basin in the world,” Melcher told the Montana Audubon Council recently. ”1 guarantee the leasing by the Energy Department is imminent, probably to come up sometime this year.” The 2.220 000-acre Yellowstone Park – which borders Wyoming, Montana. and Idaho – was established March 1, 1872 by Congress to preserve its geysers, terraces and other thermal features as well as its wildlife and countless scenic-recreation attractions. Old Faithful, best known of the geysers, if one of nature’s most unusual phenomena, erupting with regularity and sending about 1’1,000 gallons of water skyward. It is but one of several thousand thermal features in Yellowstone, says the National Park Service which administers the park. The U.S. Geological Survey, according to Melcher. has conducted a study on possible effects of the proposed geothermal development across the border westward into Idaho and has promised to monitor the program, “But how can they know when damage is done’!” Melcher asks. “1 suppose they would just monitor any damage, too.” The senator claims the underground thermal activity in Yellowstone could be connected to the underlying strata in the proposed Island Park Geothermal Area. He believes the very proximity of the two areas warrants blocking the proposal by law. If the Montanan is right. the proposed energy development could bring features of two prime public interests – tourism and energy – into conflict. Congress should examine this program carefully. And the people are entitled to all the facts when studies have been completed, plus full opportunity to express themselves on the question.